{"entry":268,"type":"pre_action_verdict","created_at":1790709552,"pubkey_hex":"6786e18a864893a900bd9858e650f67ccc3513f248fed374b591e2ff6922fbb7","event_id":"03c427f6b45b71f622b3c45aea667f677f85e134cca27f3f99713106c4241427","proof_event":{"id":"03c427f6b45b71f622b3c45aea667f677f85e134cca27f3f99713106c4241427","pubkey":"6786e18a864893a900bd9858e650f67ccc3513f248fed374b591e2ff6922fbb7","created_at":1790709552,"kind":30078,"tags":[["d","invinoveritas-proof-7397ba08c0f020629b1c13e4306045b1542e666bd32b324e13e7b2381871446c-1790709552-6ea2b631"],["t","invinoveritas"],["t","proof"],["schema","invinoveritas.verdict_proof.v1"]],"content":"{\"artifact_hash\":\"7397ba08c0f020629b1c13e4306045b1542e666bd32b324e13e7b2381871446c\",\"artifact_type\":\"governance_decision\",\"canonicalization_version\":\"rfc8785.v1\",\"confidence\":0.9,\"conformance_suite\":\"https://github.com/babyblueviper1/preaction-governance-conformance\",\"context_provenance\":\"caller_asserted_unverified\",\"decision_ref\":\"sha256:45c612d0673246c83fc90f5197cc7f28523ad41230d5f8d2d7255d854559683c\",\"decision_ref_preimage_fields\":[\"artifact_hash\",\"artifact_type\",\"policy_version\",\"verdict\",\"source_class\",\"vantage_limitation\",\"related_decision_ref\",\"intended_audience\",\"confidentiality_tier\",\"disclosed_summary\",\"intended_verifier\",\"policy_commitment\",\"verified_at\",\"registry_as_of\",\"registry_snapshot_sha256\",\"action_binding_tool_hash\",\"action_binding_args_hash\",\"action_binding_agent_id\",\"action_binding_nonce\",\"freshness_beacon_hash\",\"epistemic_basis\",\"external_evidence_hash\",\"canonicalization_version\",\"related_claims_hash\",\"related_claims_result\",\"related_claims_comparison_version\",\"mediator_attestation_hash\"],\"decision_ref_preimage_rule\":\"every name in decision_ref_preimage_fields is a key in the hashed preimage object, always -- absent fields (e.g. vantage_limitation when not applicable) are present as JSON null, never omitted from the object.\",\"engine_generation\":1,\"epistemic_basis\":null,\"freshness_beacon\":{\"block_time\":1790707464,\"hash\":\"000000000000000000012169707ee22087f306be92086f0f4265ebfc53348123\",\"height\":969190,\"source\":\"bitcoin\"},\"freshness_beacon_hash\":\"sha256:bdc17f2589046162c5487d9b5d4c776b30ee844b2d1e79f41b9ebab852f8b7a5\",\"independent_nodes\":[\"https://invinoveritas-castra.babyblueviper.workers.dev/verify\",\"https://babyblueviper1--2aba75da693711f185891607ee4eb77e.web.val.run\"],\"key_id\":\"6786e18a864893a900bd9858e650f67ccc3513f248fed374b591e2ff6922fbb7\",\"platform\":\"invinoveritas\",\"policy_commitment\":\"sha256:ce58857dea9f9851394bd3126f9aca28b8ef7cc95cc3562ab0e4a863f8be73fe\",\"policy_commitment_inputs\":{\"conformance_suite_commit\":\"e90948ed3eb9d36eb1d0997ea4d02045e28a405a\",\"conformance_suite_repo\":\"babyblueviper1/preaction-governance-conformance\",\"rubric_doc_path\":\"docs/policy_spec/invinoveritas.review.v12.md\",\"rubric_sha256\":\"bb74afa68bd5e8b1ca1038d8f0c8cd9a0d1f83888a7ea7df7c551f579a974180\"},\"policy_version\":\"invinoveritas.review.v22\",\"registry_as_of\":null,\"registry_snapshot_sha256\":null,\"related_claims_result\":\"not_supplied\",\"review_model_hash\":\"deda3dc02a1d1575f15d5c9f9b3e31cf0c768a55508c31e7ff0f4fc8f33fc669\",\"review_prompt_template_hash\":\"13a72a4c1e3a99b969ac46b724eceef6620716292f2b730f19915cdd469c1e31\",\"schema\":\"invinoveritas.verdict_proof.v1\",\"source_class\":\"agent_reported\",\"summary_hash\":\"fa422362f9e632e918be82daf6005b339701dc825019e9b2d5ff3aa0e39fc87f\",\"verdict\":\"approve_with_concerns\",\"verified_at\":1790709551,\"verifier_keys\":\"https://api.babyblueviper.com/.well-known/verifier-keys.json\",\"verifier_pubkey\":\"6786e18a864893a900bd9858e650f67ccc3513f248fed374b591e2ff6922fbb7\",\"verify_how\":\"Easiest: install the offline verifier above and recompute locally. Or POST this proof's signed `event` to verify_url (or an independent_node), OR run NIP-01 yourself: recompute the Nostr event id = sha256([0,pubkey,created_at,kind,tags,content]), verify the schnorr signature against verifier_pubkey. valid ⇒ invinoveritas issued this, untampered. No trust required.\",\"verify_offline\":\"npm i invinoveritas-verify  ·  pip install invinoveritas-verify  — recompute this proof on your own machine against verifier_pubkey; you never have to call us.\",\"verify_url\":\"https://api.babyblueviper.com/verify-proof\"}","sig":"bbe13f15f15c8e7cc182a4b906a1eabbeca9851e4019624ae269cd11f73d10eea58fd255bc1e98ec4f6d43f42e15114fa02434b55fdd8c752ef3c5fa5c1d2a5e"},"record":{"ledger":"invinoveritas verdict ledger","entry":268,"type":"pre_action_verdict","title":"Forward verdict: TRACE #397/#398 stay issuer profiles until an independent issuer passes the (now issuer-neutral) checkers","what":"A SIGNED, artifact-bound verdict committed and published BEFORE its outcome exists. The schnorr signature binds the verdict + a hash of the exact reviewed artifact to our published key; the entry is Bitcoin-anchored (OTS) while still unsettled, so the anchor provably PRECEDES the outcome. Verify via POST /verify-proof or NIP-01, with no trust in us. Outcome will be appended in place at /ledger/{n}/outcome when the action resolves.","verdict":{"verdict":"approve_with_concerns","confidence":0.9,"summary":"The gate is materially sounder now that issuer-specific assumptions are externalized and the old checker behavior is regression-tested byte-for-byte. However, settlement is not yet objectively decidable: neither \"independent issuer\" nor the reproducible evidence required for a qualifying passing run is defined.","issues":[{"severity":"high","category":"missing_check","description":"“Independent issuer” has no operational definition or adjudication process. A proposer-controlled, maintainer-adjacent, or newly created nominally separate issuer could claim independence and settle the gate without demonstrating the intended independent adoption; conversely, a genuinely independent issuer could be disputed after the fact.","suggested_fix":"Publish acceptance criteria before any run counts: define disallowed control/financial/maintainer relationships, required issuer identity/provenance evidence, who adjudicates disputes, and require the issuer—not the proposer or maintainer—to publish the run."},{"severity":"medium","category":"correctness","description":"A “passing run” is not reproducibly specified. Without requiring the exact checker commit, immutable profile hash, fixture/input corpus, command/environment, and complete output, a later profile edit or environment difference can make an asserted pass impossible to independently reproduce.","suggested_fix":"Require a public, reproducible attestation containing checker commit b403534 (or an explicitly governed successor), profile content hash, test fixture hashes, invocation command, environment/version details, and full machine-readable results."},{"severity":"medium","category":"intent_mismatch","description":"Settlement on a pass for either #397 or #398 is ambiguous if the two claims exercise different marker semantics or checker paths. A passing run that only covers one claim could be treated as validating both related standards decisions without evidence that the other is interoperable.","suggested_fix":"State whether one qualifying run settles both issues; if not, require a qualifying independent run and explicit relevant-case coverage for each issue separately."},{"severity":"medium","category":"correctness","description":"No independent issuer within 120 days demonstrates lack of observed adoption, not that the gate is technically a closed door. Treating the timeout as proof of infeasibility risks re-scoping a valid requirement because of discoverability, incentive, or timing failures rather than checker inaccessibility.","suggested_fix":"Define the 120-day outcome as an adoption-evidence timeout and require a documented review of outreach, reproducibility, and any attempted runs before re-scoping; do not characterize absence of a run as technical impossibility."}]},"proof":{"event_id":"03c427f6b45b71f622b3c45aea667f677f85e134cca27f3f99713106c4241427","pubkey":"6786e18a864893a900bd9858e650f67ccc3513f248fed374b591e2ff6922fbb7","artifact_sha256_in_event":true,"how_to_verify":"POST /verify-proof with this Nostr event, or run NIP-01; the artifact_hash binds it to the exact artifact reviewed."},"outcome_status":"pending — settles when the action resolves","ts":1790709552},"posted_at":1790709552,"relays":["relay.damus.io","nos.lol","relay.primal.net"],"posted":true,"ots_anchor":{"mechanism":"opentimestamps-bitcoin-pow","digest":"03c427f6b45b71f622b3c45aea667f677f85e134cca27f3f99713106c4241427","digest_meaning":"the verdict's signed Nostr event_id, stamped as the OTS digest directly","status":"confirmed","precedence":true,"precedence_basis":"stamped pre-outcome — entry unsettled and fresh at stamp time","calendars":["https://a.pool.opentimestamps.org","https://b.pool.opentimestamps.org","https://a.pool.eternitywall.com","https://ots.btc.catallaxy.com"],"stamped_at":"2026-09-29T19:31:38Z","ots_path":"/data/track_record/ots/03c427f6b45b71f622b3c45aea667f677f85e134cca27f3f99713106c4241427.ots","verify":"ots verify -d 03c427f6b45b71f622b3c45aea667f677f85e134cca27f3f99713106c4241427 03c427f6b45b71f622b3c45aea667f677f85e134cca27f3f99713106c4241427.ots  (recomputable against any Bitcoin explorer; no trust in us)","bitcoin_block_height":969197,"confirmed_at":"2026-09-29T21:21:39Z","bitcoin_block_time":1790714131,"bitcoin_block_hash":"00000000000000000001b5b3c8efb0ac718c4c53d856833d692cea68da762b34","ots_proof_url":"https://api.babyblueviper.com/ledger/268/ots"},"commitment_proof":{"mechanism":"nostr-relay-publication","event_id":"03c427f6b45b71f622b3c45aea667f677f85e134cca27f3f99713106c4241427","signed_at":1790709552,"published_at":1790709552,"relays":["relay.damus.io","nos.lol","relay.primal.net"],"how_to_check":"fetch the event by id from any listed public relay and confirm created_at; relays held the signed verdict from published_at, before the outcome settled","ots_anchor":{"mechanism":"opentimestamps-bitcoin-pow","digest":"03c427f6b45b71f622b3c45aea667f677f85e134cca27f3f99713106c4241427","digest_meaning":"the verdict's signed Nostr event_id, stamped as the OTS digest directly","status":"confirmed","precedence":true,"precedence_basis":"stamped pre-outcome — entry unsettled and fresh at stamp time","calendars":["https://a.pool.opentimestamps.org","https://b.pool.opentimestamps.org","https://a.pool.eternitywall.com","https://ots.btc.catallaxy.com"],"stamped_at":"2026-09-29T19:31:38Z","ots_path":"/data/track_record/ots/03c427f6b45b71f622b3c45aea667f677f85e134cca27f3f99713106c4241427.ots","verify":"ots verify -d 03c427f6b45b71f622b3c45aea667f677f85e134cca27f3f99713106c4241427 03c427f6b45b71f622b3c45aea667f677f85e134cca27f3f99713106c4241427.ots  (recomputable against any Bitcoin explorer; no trust in us)","bitcoin_block_height":969197,"confirmed_at":"2026-09-29T21:21:39Z","bitcoin_block_time":1790714131,"bitcoin_block_hash":"00000000000000000001b5b3c8efb0ac718c4c53d856833d692cea68da762b34","ots_proof_url":"https://api.babyblueviper.com/ledger/268/ots"},"timing":{"hierarchy":"Bitcoin PoW (OpenTimestamps, trust-maximal) > original relay copy (tightest time) > on-chain committedAt > survivor floor (ERC-8299 Appendix B)","tier":0,"timestamp":1790714131,"claim":"Bitcoin proof-of-work (OpenTimestamps): the verdict event_id provably existed by this block's timestamp, anchored to a clock no chain operator or our key can move or back-date. Trust-maximal; the relay tier gives a tighter time on weaker trust.","available":{"tier0_btc_pow":1790714131,"tier1_relay_attested":null,"tier2_onchain_committed_at":null,"tier3_survivor_floor":null},"btc_pow":{"status":"confirmed","precedence":true,"bitcoin_block_height":969197,"bitcoin_block_time":1790714131,"verify":"ots verify -d 03c427f6b45b71f622b3c45aea667f677f85e134cca27f3f99713106c4241427 03c427f6b45b71f622b3c45aea667f677f85e134cca27f3f99713106c4241427.ots  (recomputable against any Bitcoin explorer; no trust in us)","note":"trust-maximal anchor, un-forgeable Bitcoin proof-of-work — pre-outcome precedence","precedence_cross_check":null},"committed_at":null,"committed_at_reference":"judgment_type=outcome_verifiable (ERC-8274): committed_at MUST predate the realized outcome's settlement. committed_at is the tier-2 on-chain committedAt sourced from the ERC-8263 proofHash leg (see truthanchor_8263) — distinct from the ERC-8281/OCP input anchor, which commits the input, not the verdict."},"judgment_type":"outcome_verifiable"},"judgment_execution":{"spec":"JudgmentExecutionAttestation — ERC-8299 L4 composition (reviewed→executed commitment; origin t/28655 #11)","hash_alg":"sha256","raw_proposal_hash":"7397ba08c0f020629b1c13e4306045b1542e666bd32b324e13e7b2381871446c","verdict_ref":{"binding":"nostr-event","event_id":"03c427f6b45b71f622b3c45aea667f677f85e134cca27f3f99713106c4241427"},"verdict_timestamp":1790709552,"executed_action_hash":null,"status":"entry predates executed-intent commitment wiring; action_taken is disclosed in the record and the outcome settled on-chain, but no separate executed-action hash was committed at the time (not backfilled by design)"},"outcome_evidence":{"question":"was the verdict later right or wrong? (distinct from commitment_proof's 'was it committed before the outcome was known?')","mechanism":"on-chain-settlement","account":"0x3b2A858806Fa4DEb9191Bb7918350fDB774603A4","note":"every governed trade settles on this public Hyperliquid account; the signed trade-outcome digest entries below contain the settled rows published at/after this verdict — wins AND losses","settled_digests":[],"status":"pending"}}